IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v70y2022i3p599-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: Tax Expenditures—Lessons from the Elimination of Ontario's Tuition and Education Tax Credits

Author

Listed:
  • Christine Neill

    (Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario)

  • Tracy Snoddon

    (Department of Economics, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario)

Abstract

Stanley Surrey and others have highlighted tax expenditures as being hidden forms of spending that can evade the type of analysis and scrutiny applied to direct spending programs, allowing inefficient and inequitable programs to persist. But there is only limited empirical evidence on differences in the persistence of similar programs in a tax measure compared to a direct spending form. The conversion of Ontario's education and tuition tax expenditures into a direct form of spending via the existing student aid program provides an interesting case study. As discussed in this article, although the tax credits had never been the subject of a value-for-money audit, the student aid program was reviewed in 2018 shortly after the changeover, to hearty criticism of its distributional effects despite its being less regressive than the tax credit versions. This led to substantial cuts in the program, in line with views on the persistence of tax expenditures.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine Neill & Tracy Snoddon, 2022. "Policy Forum: Tax Expenditures—Lessons from the Elimination of Ontario's Tuition and Education Tax Credits," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 70(3), pages 599-613.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:599-613
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2022.70.3.pf.neill.snoddon
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2022CTJ3.aspx
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2022.70.3.pf.neill.snoddon?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:599-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.