IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v66y2018i4p847-869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: Equalization and Canada's Fiscal Constitution--The Tie That Binds?

Author

Listed:
  • Richard M. Bird

    (Professor emeritus, University of Toronto)

Abstract

Canada has had a fiscal equalization system since 1957, and equalization was formally embedded in the constitution in 1982. However, the rationale for equalization, how the concept is defined and applied, and what its effects are or should be are all issues that continue to be vigorously debated in both political and expert circles. This article reviews some of these issues and concludes that, on the whole, equalization has played a useful role in helping Canada to get through the last half-century as well as it has. However, the system could be improved by making it more transparent--for example, by fixing the amount to be distributed at (say) the present share of the federal budget (instead of indexing it to a moving average of nominal growth in the gross domestic product), and making the distributional formula less overtly political by establishing a quasi-independent board to examine the allocation formula from time to time and make ecommendations for change. Governments at both the federal and provincial levels would then be more accountable for their actions, as they should be in a democracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard M. Bird, 2018. "Policy Forum: Equalization and Canada's Fiscal Constitution--The Tie That Binds?," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 66(4), pages 847-869.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:66:y:2018:i:4:p:847-869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2018CTJ4.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:66:y:2018:i:4:p:847-869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.