IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v66y2018i2p387-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: From Independent Tax Commission to Independent Tax Authority

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Heath

    (School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Toronto)

Abstract

Taxation is one area in which the imperatives of "good policy" and those of "good politics" consistently diverge. This has given rise to the occasional call to depoliticize tax policy, through the creation of an independent tax authority (ITA) that would be responsible for setting general tax policy and would operate with substantial independence from the government of the day. Such a change would obviously represent a move in the direction of a more "technocratic" form of government and will be resisted on those grounds. In order to advance the discussion, I begin this article by arguing that an ITA represents a response to a genuine problem, which is the exploitation by politicians of public ignorance and irrationality with respect to taxes. This leads to inefficiencies and inequalities that are introduced into the tax code, and also wasted time and energy through the constant diversion of public debate into arguments over pseudo-issues. Having motivated the proposal, I then outline the basic institutional structure that an ITA could have in Canada, the kind of mandate that it would be given, and the types of taxes that it would control. I conclude by presenting some of the more obvious objections and attempting a response.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Heath, 2018. "Policy Forum: From Independent Tax Commission to Independent Tax Authority," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 66(2), pages 387-399.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:66:y:2018:i:2:p:387-399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2018CTJ2.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:66:y:2018:i:2:p:387-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.