IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v65y2017i2p291-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Options To Address the Direct Tax Challenges Raised by the Digital Economy--A Critical Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Dale Pinto

    (Curtin Law School, Curtin University, Western Australia)

Abstract

This article examines recent initiatives relating to measures that governments may adopt to deal with the direct taxation challenges raised by the digital economy. The expansion and increasing interconnection of technologies to facilitate global commerce have created gaps in the tax net, which have been exploited by multinational companies to minimize or avoid taxation in their home countries. One strategy in particular--the relocation of activities and profits to low-tax or no-tax jurisdictions--has generated concern about the loss of substantial tax revenues among governments across the globe. Accordingly, at the request of the Group of Twenty (G20) countries, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has undertaken a comprehensive study of the problem of base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS), with a view to developing recommended actions that governments may implement to protect their tax base. The OECD published interim reports on these actions in 2014 and final recommendations in 2015. These include proposed measures that are specifically directed at direct taxation issues associated with the digital economy. This article presents a critical analysis of the options set out by the OECD, in the hope that this will assist governments in deciding which measures will best address the impact of the BEPS problem on the fairness and integrity of their tax systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Dale Pinto, 2017. "Options To Address the Direct Tax Challenges Raised by the Digital Economy--A Critical Analysis," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 65(2), pages 291-331.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:65:y:2017:i:2:p:291-331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2017CTJ2.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:65:y:2017:i:2:p:291-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.