IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v62y2014i2p401-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GAAR Revisited: From Instinctive Reaction to Intellectual Rigour

Author

Listed:
  • Pooja Samtani

    (Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Toronto)

  • Justin Kutyan

    (KPMG Law LLP, Toronto)

Abstract

In the 25 years since the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) came into effect, the possibilities and perils of tax avoidance have given rise to much debate. Less openly discussed are the subjective considerations that affect the resolution of GAAR cases and the uncertainty that such influences create. This article reviews the more significant, but less tangible, aspects of the GAAR analysis. It seeks to determine whether the cases decided to date can be rationalized so as to reveal certain recurring legal themes, even though the decisions were made in varying factual circumstances. The authors examine the scope of GAAR with reference to the driving factors, objective and otherwise, that have informed its application. In particular, they explore an interpretive approach to GAAR that remains grounded in intellectual rigour, even when influenced by instinctive reaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Pooja Samtani & Justin Kutyan, 2014. "GAAR Revisited: From Instinctive Reaction to Intellectual Rigour," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 62(2), pages 401-428.
    • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:62:y:2014:i:2:p:401-428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2014CTJ2.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:62:y:2014:i:2:p:401-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.