IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v61y2013i2p321-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GAAR in Action: An Empirical Exploration of Tax Court of Canada Cases (1997-2009) and Judicial Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Jinyan Li

    (Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto)

  • Thaddeus Hwong

    (Faculty of Liberal Arts & Professional Studies, York University, Toronto)

Abstract

This article presents a modest, exploratory empirical study of Canada's general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) in action. The study examines the entire body of GAAR cases decided by the Tax Court of Canada in the period 1997-2009, as well as certain personal and societal attributes of the judges who decided these cases. The findings support three tentative conclusions. First, GAAR has been a game changer, albeit a modest one, with respect to the courts' approach to tax-avoidance cases. Second, while considerable uncertainty remains with respect to the application of GAAR, a pattern in judicial decisions appears to be emerging. Third, there are indications that a judicial smell test is at play in some GAAR decisions; in particular, judicial decision making in GAAR cases appears to have been influenced by the judge's attributes, including experience on the Tax Court, gender, preappointment experience, and regional ties. Because the data sets examined in the study are very small, these findings are by no means conclusive. Nevertheless, the hope is that they will help to advance empirical understanding of GAAR in action.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinyan Li & Thaddeus Hwong, 2013. "GAAR in Action: An Empirical Exploration of Tax Court of Canada Cases (1997-2009) and Judicial Decision Making," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 61(2), pages 321-366.
    • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:61:y:2013:i:2:p:321-366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2013CTJ2.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:61:y:2013:i:2:p:321-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.