IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cta/jcppxx/2111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legislative and institutional framework in the field of discrimination in romania

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Campeanu

Abstract

This article analyses the legislative and institutional framework involved in the fight against discrimination in Romania. The conclusion of the analysis show how the legislative framework in Romania is in agreement with CE directives in the field of non-discrimination, even exceeding the provisions of these directives in some places. However, the institutional practices and real accessibility of the system are not at the level of its potential. The laws and the problem solving mechanisms are insufficiently known by the population, while the administrative apparatus is insufficiently well developed in the territory, which is why most of the cases judged by the courts of law or by NCDC come from the area of the capital and from the large urban centres. The state institutions assigned to monitor and sanction the acts of discrimination, particularly in the field of the work relations only notice facts and collect general data; they don’t actually investigate the cases of law infringement in the field of non-discrimination. Although the related legislative framework is solid and sufficiently comprehensive, and the framework law (O.G. 137/2000) is mandatory for the litigations, some laws and provisions allow or provide a cover/justification/explanation for some behaviours which would be included in mobbing, by transferring the “problem” to the sphere of the legitimacy of the economic interest of the employer, by using the language of the personal efficiency and competency, by defining a legitimate area of manoeuvre for the employer or its representatives and by creating some contexts which deter the solidarity or cooperation between the employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Campeanu, 2011. "Legislative and institutional framework in the field of discrimination in romania," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 2, pages 5-26.
  • Handle: RePEc:cta:jcppxx:2111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jppc.ro/index.php/jppc/article/download/57/47
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cta:jcppxx:2111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ene Mihai The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ene Mihai to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jppc.ro/?lang=en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.