IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cta/jcppxx/1266.html

NEET, But Not the Same: The Widening Educational Divide Between NEETs and EETs in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Theodor Barbu
  • Mara Cace

Abstract

Romania's NEET population has become increasingly less educated relative to young people in education, employment, or training, with the proportional educational gap widened from −9% to −33% between 2014 and 2024, a trajectory that diverges sharply from the gradual EU27 trend. This article documents and explains that divergence by applying and extending the Δedu indicator of Pesquera Alonso, Muñoz Sánchez, and Iniesta Martínez to Romania using Eurostat panel data. Bivariate regression models across 30 variables spanning labour market structure, sectoral composition, household characteristics, and educational indicators, are estimated for Romania and the EU27, and disaggregated by gender. Unemployment and NEET rates do not predict the educational composition of the NEET population. The near-absence of part-time employment (R² = 0.956), the decline of traditional low-skill sectors, and the prevalence of extended-family households are the strongest correlates of the widening gap, and several of these associations operate in the opposite direction in Romania compared to Southern Europe. When the results are broken down by gender, a more complex picture emerges as men's educational gap is shaped primarily by the availability of sector-specific employment, while women's reflects family structure and care responsibilities operating outside the labour market. These findings point to the labour market and the broader socio-economic context, rather than the educational system, as the primary structural setting for Romania's NEET educational divide, and suggest the need for gender-differentiated rather than uniform policy responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodor Barbu & Mara Cace, 2026. "NEET, But Not the Same: The Widening Educational Divide Between NEETs and EETs in Romania," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 1, pages 143-193.
  • Handle: RePEc:cta:jcppxx:1266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jppc.ro/index.php/jppc/article/view/1086/506
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cta:jcppxx:1266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ene Mihai The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Ene Mihai to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.jppc.ro/?lang=en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.