IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v51y2025is2p93-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Finance Policies and Practices of Canadian Development Financial Institutions and Multilateral Development Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Asher Imam
  • Olaf Weber

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of Canadian development finance institutions (DFIs) and international multilateral development banks (MDBs). It examines the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles into investment decisions and the alignment of impact reporting with the Sustainable Development Goals. The study conducts a detailed content analysis of the sustainability, annual, or ESG reports of selected institutions from fiscal year 2021 to fiscal year 2023, highlighting distinct thematic differences using a mixed-methods approach. Canadian DFIs prioritize social inclusion, gender equity, and Indigenous economic development, whereas MDBs focus more on climate risk, biodiversity, and green finance. Although both demonstrate collective efforts toward sustainability, Canadian DFIs are still behind on themes such as Scope 3 emissions (value-chain) disclosure, biodiversity finance, and impact measurement. The findings identify two key opportunities for Canadian DFIs: (a) to advance ESG integration by adopting international best practices, including just transition frameworks, grievance mechanisms, and impact dashboards, and (b) to improve sustainability reporting via standardized frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative and Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures.

Suggested Citation

  • Asher Imam & Olaf Weber, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Finance Policies and Practices of Canadian Development Financial Institutions and Multilateral Development Banks," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 51(S2), pages 93-104, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:51:y:2025:i:s2:p:93-104
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2025-044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2025-044
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2025-044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:51:y:2025:i:s2:p:93-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.