IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v51y2025is2p132-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Pathway for Decarbonizing Canada's Maritime Transport: Short-Term (2025–2035), Medium-Term (2035–2050), and Long-Term (2050 and beyond)

Author

Listed:
  • Ayat-Allah Bouramdane

Abstract

Decarbonizing Canada's maritime transport sector is a priority driven by climate commitments and the need to cut shipping emissions. While most studies focus on individual technologies or single criteria, this research applies the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) framework to assess multiple decarbonization strategies across economic, environmental, technological, and regulatory factors. It identifies key criteria, evaluates strategies, and explores their interactions, including the financial sector's role in supporting the transition. Environmental Impact (28%) ranks as the most critical criterion, followed by Economic Viability (20%), Technological Feasibility (13%), Scalability and Flexibility (9%), and Energy Security (9%). Additional factors include Life-Cycle Analysis (5%), Infrastructure Requirements (4%), Social and Political Feasibility (4%), Safety and Risk Management (4%), and Implementation Timeline (4%). The evaluation ranks Energy Efficiency Improvements (S7) as the most effective strategy (0.753) due to its feasibility and economic benefits. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) (S1) follows (0.698), but it is limited by methane emissions. Biofuels (S2) and Electrification (via Battery-Powered Ships) (S8) score 0.563, as they are facing sustainability and battery constraints, respectively. Green Hydrogen (S3), Green Ammonia (S4), and Synthetic Fuels (or e-Fuels) (S5) score 0.483, offering long-term potential but also being hindered by infrastructure challenges. Ocean-Based Fuels (S6) rank lowest (0.403) due to their early stage development. These findings suggest that the optimal decarbonization pathway follows a phased approach: prioritizing energy efficiency and transitional fuels (LNG, biofuels) in the short term (2025–2035); scaling up green hydrogen, ammonia, and synthetic fuels in the medium term (2035–2050); and advancing full electrification and ocean-based fuels beyond 2050 (supported by policy, investment, and infrastructure). In this way, the study provides insights for policy-makers, industry, and financial institutions by helping prioritize investments and policy measures while highlighting the need for public–private partnerships, regulatory incentives, and green financing. However, the MCDM-AHP approach involves subjective weighting, and it thus requires validation through case studies and quantitative modelling. Future research should also explore nuclear propulsion, which could be a high-energy-density solution for long-distance shipping, and carbon capture technologies, which could capture CO2 emissions from ships and help to reduce their environmental impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayat-Allah Bouramdane, 2025. "Optimal Pathway for Decarbonizing Canada's Maritime Transport: Short-Term (2025–2035), Medium-Term (2035–2050), and Long-Term (2050 and beyond)," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 51(S2), pages 132-182, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:51:y:2025:i:s2:p:132-182
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2025-019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2025-019
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2025-019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:51:y:2025:i:s2:p:132-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.