IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v51y2025i3p363-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Intersectionality in Policy: A Review and Analysis of Guidance

Author

Listed:
  • Ashlee Christoffersen
  • Gemma Hunting
  • Olena Hankivsky

Abstract

Addressing inequities is a pressing policy priority, particularly with growing awareness of interlocking global challenges, including pandemic recovery. Although Canada has been a leader in developing intersectionality-informed policy approaches, interest in intersectionality is growing internationally. Yet, misunderstandings persist on how to operationalize intersectionality, and calls are being made to develop clear and effective guidance to do this. This article presents results of a scoping review of policy-relevant guidance on operationalizing intersectionality, including tools, guides, and frameworks. The findings include an analysis of where such work is being produced, whether guidance to date aligns with the key tenets of intersectionality, examples of promising practices, and approaches that fall short of effectively operationalizing intersectionality. This is the first review of its kind internationally and provides insights into what is required in guidance to ensure the value added of intersectional analysis in working toward mitigating inequities and promoting social justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashlee Christoffersen & Gemma Hunting & Olena Hankivsky, 2025. "Integrating Intersectionality in Policy: A Review and Analysis of Guidance," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 51(3), pages 363-383, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:51:y:2025:i:3:p:363-383
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2024-054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2024-054
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2024-054?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:51:y:2025:i:3:p:363-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.