IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v51y2025i1p35-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Are Young Children Not in Child Care? Typologies of Child Care Non-Use among Canadian Children under Six Years

Author

Listed:
  • Karine J. Lavergne

Abstract

I examine child care non-use prior to the 2021-2026 Canada-wide early learning and child care agreements between the federal and provincial and territorial governments supported by a federal investment of up to C$30 billion. Using the Statistics Canada Survey on Early Learning and Child Care Arrangements collected in 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2020 (mid-pandemic), I conducted latent class analyses of parental reasons for not using child care and identified six similar typologies of child care non-use in both cohorts, plus a typology of pandemic-constrained parents in 2020. Some parents did not seem to want child care (i.e., volitional stay-at-home parents, parents accommodated by school, employed parents on leave, out-of-work parents). Others appeared to have unmet child care demand due to affordability barriers or pandemic constraints. I estimate unmet demand to have been equivalent to 201,858 children under six years (9 percent) in 2019 and 394,881 children (17 percent) in 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Karine J. Lavergne, 2025. "Why Are Young Children Not in Child Care? Typologies of Child Care Non-Use among Canadian Children under Six Years," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 51(1), pages 35-60, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:51:y:2025:i:1:p:35-60
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2023-065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2023-065
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2023-065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:51:y:2025:i:1:p:35-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.