IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v49y2023is1p94-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing Job Stability in Ontario: Comparing Long-Term-Care Homes with Other Health Care Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Alyssa Drost
  • Arthur Sweetman

Abstract

Claims of high turnover, reflecting worker dissatisfaction, in the long-term-care home (LTCH) sector have been common during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Using a census of registered nurses (RNs) and registered practical nurses (RPNs) in Ontario from 2014 to 2020, we compare LTCHs and other health care sectors in terms of (a) worker and job characteristics and (b) job turnover (distinct from occupational turnover). RNs in LTCHs are older, have lower levels of education, and are more likely to be trained outside of Canada compared with the provincial average, whereas RPNs are more similar to that norm. LTCH jobs are more likely to be rural and to involve casual contracts and irregular hours than those in most, but not all, sectors. Pre-pandemic, RNs in LTCHs were in the middle of the sectoral turnover distribution, whereas RPNs were lower than all sectors except hospitals. Among nurses who changed jobs, LTCH sectoral retention was similar to that in other sectors. Overall, turnover measures do not suggest lower job satisfaction in LTCHs than other sectors. During the first year of the pandemic, small changes in turnover were observed, but it is difficult to disentangle pandemic restrictions on holding multiple jobs from other causes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alyssa Drost & Arthur Sweetman, 2023. "Nursing Job Stability in Ontario: Comparing Long-Term-Care Homes with Other Health Care Sectors," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 49(S1), pages 94-118, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:49:y:2023:i:s1:p:94-118
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2022-039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2022-039
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2022-039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:49:y:2023:i:s1:p:94-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.