IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v49y2023i4p347-361.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Decades of Poverty Reduction Politics in Canada: Better for Single-Parent Families and Single Working-Age Adults?

Author

Listed:
  • Geranda Notten
  • Fatima Tuz Zohora
  • Charles Plante
  • Rachel Laforest

Abstract

Poverty reduction is a complex task. We investigate whether the position of single-parent families and single working-age adults has improved in a political context that has—at least rhetorically—prioritized poverty reduction across all higher-level jurisdictions in Canada. Both groups experience very high poverty rates. We analyze income poverty changes from 1999 to 2017 in a relative sense (compared to the typical Canadian) and an absolute sense (purchasing power). Controlling for demographic and regional characteristics, we find that the poverty disadvantage declined for both groups. Improvements for single-parent families were strong and widespread across provinces. Those for single adults of working age were smaller and more concentrated in provinces experiencing stronger economic growth. These results support the claim that governments prioritized the inclusion of families with dependent children while the inclusion of single working-age adults was largely left to the fortunes of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Geranda Notten & Fatima Tuz Zohora & Charles Plante & Rachel Laforest, 2023. "Two Decades of Poverty Reduction Politics in Canada: Better for Single-Parent Families and Single Working-Age Adults?," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 49(4), pages 347-361, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:49:y:2023:i:4:p:347-361
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2023-006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2023-006
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2023-006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:49:y:2023:i:4:p:347-361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.