IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v48y2022i4p549-556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Reanalysis of "The Town with No Poverty": A Reply

Author

Listed:
  • Evelyn L. Forget

Abstract

David Green (2022) argues that MINCOME data do not support claims that a GAI reduces health care costs. I stand behind the conclusions drawn in "The Town with No Poverty" (2011): MINCOME is associated with a significant reduction in hospitalization rates among subjects relative to matched comparators. Green's critique depends heavily on data from 1974 and 1975 which were biased by the pre-announcement of MINCOME. It also rests on implicit and questionable assumptions about how hospitals operate, particularly in rural and remote parts of Canada, and how social determinants, including income, affect health outcomes. I provide evidence that corroborates my analytical choices and supports the conclusion drawn in the original paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelyn L. Forget, 2022. "A Reanalysis of "The Town with No Poverty": A Reply," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 48(4), pages 549-556, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:48:y:2022:i:4:p:549-556
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2022-017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2022-017
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2022-017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:48:y:2022:i:4:p:549-556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.