IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v48y2022i1p74-90.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Encadrement du bruit environnemental au Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Josée Laplace
  • Edda Bild
  • Christopher Trudeua
  • Maxime Perna
  • Thomas Dupont
  • Catherine Guastavino

Abstract

Environmental noise-both a quality of life and a public health issue-is regulated by and at different levels of government that vary throughout the world. In Canada, the federal, provincial and municipal governments (as well as other regional and local entities) share responsibilities for regulating noise from different sources, like transportation, leisure, industry or construction. The present review covers policies and regulations developed since the 1970s by different levels of government and shows a fragmented and uneven portrait that varies by provinces, as well as a multiplicity of stakeholders and measures that should be better integrated and harmonized. The current approach to noise, often focused on a posteriori redress and on controlling noise levels, is insufficient to address the wide variety of noise issues. We argue that it could be widened and enriched by (i) a qualitative analysis of the various sensibilities of different people to types of noise and their context, and (ii) planning tools that would integrate sound considerations in the early stages of land development and management practices. Thus improved, noise regulations would better equip different Canadian governmental actors to respond to the high economic and social costs of this environmental pollutant and to the desire to reduce inequalities in population noise exposures.

Suggested Citation

  • Josée Laplace & Edda Bild & Christopher Trudeua & Maxime Perna & Thomas Dupont & Catherine Guastavino, 2022. "Encadrement du bruit environnemental au Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 48(1), pages 74-90, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:48:y:2022:i:1:p:74-90
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2021-009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2021-009
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2021-009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:48:y:2022:i:1:p:74-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.