IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v47y2021i3p373-398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student Aid Reforms in Quebec: Is Changing the Clawback Rate Better than Changing the Base Grant?

Author

Listed:
  • Pier-André Bouchard St-Amant
  • Hugo Morin

Abstract

We examine two ways through which student financial aid can be reformed: a cut in the rate at which the aid is clawed back with earned income or an increase in the threshold at which this clawback applies. We present a theoretical and empirical analysis of these options. We show that both reduce incentives to work, although the clawback rate does so less. Cuts to clawbacks also deliver a bigger boost to financial aid for those most in need, although they may benefit students higher in the income distribution. We argue that governments might consider a policy that reduces clawback rates, but within a reasonable range of earned income.

Suggested Citation

  • Pier-André Bouchard St-Amant & Hugo Morin, 2021. "Student Aid Reforms in Quebec: Is Changing the Clawback Rate Better than Changing the Base Grant?," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 47(3), pages 373-398, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:47:y:2021:i:3:p:373-398
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2019-073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2019-073
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2019-073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:47:y:2021:i:3:p:373-398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.