IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v44y2018i4p289-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Evaluators Prefer Candidates of Their Own Gender?

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Chandler

Abstract

Increasing the number of female evaluators could help female candidates if evaluators prefer candidates of their own gender. I study whether there is any evidence of such preferences with a unique data set containing 10,500 scores given by 105 evaluators to 3,500 students in the humanities and social sciences who applied for a doctoral scholarship. On average, I find very weak evidence of same-gender preferences for male evaluators (p = 0.133). To better understand this effect, I also study same-gender preferences across the distribution of candidates, in subcommittees with different gender composition, and for evaluators from different disciplines. I show that male evaluators give higher scores to strong male candidates relative to those given by female evaluators. At the same time, male evaluators give higher scores to male candidates than do female evaluators when there is only one male evaluator in the subcommittee. The representation of men in a discipline does not seem to affect the scores given by evaluators. Overall, there is no clear evidence that replacing a male evaluator with a female one would help female candidates.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Chandler, 2018. "Do Evaluators Prefer Candidates of Their Own Gender?," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 44(4), pages 289-302, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:4:p:289-302
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2018-022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2018-022
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2018-022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marco Cozzi, 2020. "Public Funding of Research and Grant Proposals in the Social Sciences: Empirical Evidence from Canada," Department Discussion Papers 1809, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    2. José J. Domínguez, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Committee Quotas; The Role of Group Dynamics," ThE Papers 21/12, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:4:p:289-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.