IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v44y2018i2p190-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Preferences for the Distribution of Incomes in Modern Societies: The Enduring Influence of Social Class and Economic Context

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Andersen
  • Meir Yaish

Abstract

Using International Social Survey Program data, we explore the relationship between economic context and attitudes with respect to the distribution of incomes in 20 modern societies, including Canada. Our findings demonstrate that economic inequality has an enduring influence on attitudes. Consistent with the economic self-interest thesis, preferences for equality are strongest among those in working-class occupations. Moreover, independent of one's own social class, one's father's social class has a similar enduring impact on attitudes later in life. These relationships are relatively similar across the 20 societies we explore. Still, significant differences in attitudes can be explained by national economic context. We find a strong positive relationship between national-level inequality and opinions on how much inequality there ought to be in the income distribution. In contrast to previous research, however, our findings suggest that national-level economic prosperity and equality of opportunity have little influence on public opinion.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Andersen & Meir Yaish, 2018. "Preferences for the Distribution of Incomes in Modern Societies: The Enduring Influence of Social Class and Economic Context," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 44(2), pages 190-205, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:2:p:190-205
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2017-014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2017-014
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2017-014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:2:p:190-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.