IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v42y2016i3p287-307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Longitudinal Analysis of GIS Entries and Exits

Author

Listed:
  • Ross Finnie
  • David Gray
  • Yan Zhang

Abstract

We focus on one particular pillar of the public retirement income network in Canada, namely, receipt outcomes of the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) regime. This empirical analysis is carried out in a dynamic framework. We address the extent to which individuals enter the state of GIS receipt at various ages as well as the extent to which individuals who receive GIS benefits at the earliest age of eligibility subsequently exit the regime. We first measure these transition rates, and then we focus our analysis primarily on the impact of three attributes of recipients: changes in marital status, entry cohort, and current age. The econometric equations include simple transition models of both entries and exits, as well as hazard models of the probability of exit. Among our many empirical findings is a non-trivial incidence of delayed entry into the regime as well as exit from the regime conditional on prior receipt of benefits. Women who transit from married to single status are more likely to enter, but the opposite finding is discerned for men. The hazard model for the risk of exiting the GIS regime conditioned on the duration of the ongoing spell of receipt reveals a sharp pattern of negative duration dependence.

Suggested Citation

  • Ross Finnie & David Gray & Yan Zhang, 2016. "A Longitudinal Analysis of GIS Entries and Exits," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 42(3), pages 287-307, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:42:y:2016:i:3:p:287-307
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2015-077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2015-077
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2015-077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:42:y:2016:i:3:p:287-307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.