IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v40y2014i1p57-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Policy, Access to Government, and Qualitative Research Practices: Conducting Research within a Culture of Information Control

Author

Listed:
  • Farzana Nanji Jiwani
  • Tamara Krawchenko

Abstract

In-depth interviews with government officials are a critical research method for the study of government. Historical and institutional factors, and particularly the informal internal dynamics that influence policy, require a depth of understanding that is often best investigated through such interview methods. At the federal level in Canada we see many trends that point to the increasing centralization and control of government information. There has been political interference in Access to Information Requests; the outcomes of scientific research have been suppressed; and media access to politicians has become highly constrained. This led us to ask whether tightening controls on information have also affected access to research interviews with government officials. This paper explores this issue by interviewing both academics and public servants in the Canadian federal government. We ask is there evidence of a tightening grip on access to governmental research interviews and, if so, is this affecting how and what we research?

Suggested Citation

  • Farzana Nanji Jiwani & Tamara Krawchenko, 2014. "Public Policy, Access to Government, and Qualitative Research Practices: Conducting Research within a Culture of Information Control," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 40(1), pages 57-66, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:40:y:2014:i:1:p:57-66
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2012-051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2012-051
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2012-051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:40:y:2014:i:1:p:57-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.