IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v38y2012i3p395-410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying European Ideas on Federalism and Doing It Better? The Government of Canada's Homelessness Policy Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Carey Doberstein

Abstract

Despite not having explicit authority to legislate on matters local in nature, in 2000 the federal government launched the National Homelessness Initiative (NHI). I argue that this federal program, in many critical aspects, mirrors a governance model developed in the European Union called the Open Method of Coordination (OMC), a model developed in an institutional context whereby the European Commission has no formal authority to coerce member states into coordinating social policy, but nonetheless uses "soft" or voluntary mechanisms to work toward this goal. Vancouver and Toronto are examined more closely to demonstrate how the flexibility of the OMC-style model manifests itself in practice, and the implications for governance, accountability, and ef-fectiveness. I conclude that while the issue of homelessness is principally plagued by insufficient and unstable funding, further application of principles in the OMC model - uniquely applied to the Canadian context - holds promise for improving governance, coordination, and effectiveness of the public policy response to homelessness. Application of the OMC model thus calls for more attention from Canadian federalism scholars and policy-makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Carey Doberstein, 2012. "Applying European Ideas on Federalism and Doing It Better? The Government of Canada's Homelessness Policy Experiment," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 38(3), pages 395-410, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:38:y:2012:i:3:p:395-410
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.38.3.395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.38.3.395
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.38.3.395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:38:y:2012:i:3:p:395-410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.