IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v32y2006i3p243-258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'invisible qui blesse : une étude traitant de la gestion des conflits et de l'équité en emploi dans le cas des minorités visibles au Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Lucie Lamarche
  • Francine Tougas
  • Rachel Chagnon
  • Martine Lagacé

Abstract

This study investigates, among companies covered by the Canada Employment Equity Act, the hidden side of numerical progress of visible minorities achieved through the implementation of employment equity plans. More specifically, the purpose of this study is to determine whether companies with the best perfor mance in terms of the act have recognized the potential for conflict associated with the integration of visible minorities through employment equity plans and if so, have put in place conflict resolution strategies. To reach our goals, a survey was carried out among the best performing companies in terms of the act. Moreover, two focus groups were conducted among representatives of visible minorities and of the companies. The data gathered shows that both the representatives of companies and of visible minorities identified situations of intra- and inter-ethnic conflicts as well as resolution measures. The discussion highlights the fact that the changes resulting from employment equity legislation have not yet reached their limits, and underlines the importance of acknowledging conflict in attaining the ultimate goal of the act: lasting employment equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucie Lamarche & Francine Tougas & Rachel Chagnon & Martine Lagacé, 2006. "L'invisible qui blesse : une étude traitant de la gestion des conflits et de l'équité en emploi dans le cas des minorités visibles au Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 32(3), pages 243-258, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:32:y:2006:i:3:p:243-258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4128737
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:32:y:2006:i:3:p:243-258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.