IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v25y1999i4p557-561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les sondages moins rigoureux sont-ils moins fiables?

Author

Listed:
  • Sébastien Vachon
  • Claire Durand
  • André Blais

Abstract

Bill C-83 proposes to regulate the publication of polls and their methodology during electoral campaigns. It would be necessary to determine the type of pertinent methodological information in order to judge the quality of the poll. This article presents results of a study on the relation between methodology used in polls published in Quebec during the May/June 1997 federal electoral campaign and the quality of the estimates of voter intentions. Analysis verifies that, when the methodology used was less rigorous, the spread between the polls and the true voter intentions was larger and less stable even when taking account of errors due to sample size. These results underline the necessity to enforce requirements about the publication of the methodology of the surveys reported during electoral campaigns and of revising Bill C-83 accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Sébastien Vachon & Claire Durand & André Blais, 1999. "Les sondages moins rigoureux sont-ils moins fiables?," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 25(4), pages 557-561, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:25:y:1999:i:4:p:557-561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28199912%2925%3A4%3C557%3ALSMRSM%3E2.0.CO%3B2-0
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:25:y:1999:i:4:p:557-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.