IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000506/019669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metodología para la evaluación interna de una cadena de valor

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Felipe Vásquez-Barajas
  • Liliana Marcela Bastos-Osorio
  • Johanna Milena Mogrovejo-Andrade

Abstract

El objetivo de este artículo es disenar una metodología para la evaluación interna de una cadena de valor. La metodología comprende un tipo de investigación cuantitativo, un método de investigación deductivo y un tipo de estudio explicativo. Sobre los resultados, la metodología disenada para la evaluación interna se enfoca en el esquema de cadena de valor de Michael Porter con sus actividades principales y actividades de apoyo cruzadas en una matriz que permite describir y ponderar la relación de cada actividad principal con cada actividad de apoyo. La matriz propuesta ubica las 5 actividades principales en el eje vertical y las 4 actividades de apoyo en el eje horizontal; distribuye el 100 % entre las 9 actividades de la siguiente manera: un porcentaje superior al 50 % para las 5 actividades principales por ser la parte central de una cadena de valor, y el porcentaje restante para las actividades de apoyo porque sin ellas las actividades principales no estarían soportadas. En conclusión, el diseno de la metodología propuesta para la evaluación interna de la cadena de valor permite identificar actividades principales y de apoyo fuertes como ventajas competitivas o por mejorar como falencias, así como relaciones entre ellas.***The objective of this paper is to design a methodology for the internal assessment of a value chain. The methodology includes a type of quantitative research, a deductive research method and a type of explanatory study. Regarding the results, the methodology designed for the internal assessment focuses on Michael Porter's value chain scheme with its main and support activities in a matrix that allows describing and weighing the relationship of each main activity with each support activity.The proposed matrix locates the 5 main activities on the vertical axis and the 4 support activities on the horizontal axis. It distributes 100 % among the 9 activities as follows: a percentage higher than 50 % for the 5 main activities because they arethe central part of a value chain. The remaining percentage for the support activities since, without them, the main activities would not have support. In conclusion, the design of the proposed methodology for the internal assessment of the value chain makes it possible to identify strong main and support activities as competitiveness advantages or to be improved as weaknesses, as the relations between them.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Felipe Vásquez-Barajas & Liliana Marcela Bastos-Osorio & Johanna Milena Mogrovejo-Andrade, 2020. "Metodología para la evaluación interna de una cadena de valor," Revista Clio América, Universidad del Magdalena, vol. 14(27), pages 401-408, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000506:019669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.unimagdalena.edu.co/index.php/clioamerica/article/view/3685
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cadena de valor; competitividad; creación de valor; evaluación; metodología.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000506:019669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revista CLIO (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femagco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.