Author
Listed:
- Oscar Gutiérrez Molina
- Jaime Ignacio Berm�dez Guerrero
Abstract
Este artículo es el resultado de la investigación realizada en Boyacá por la UniversidadPedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, dentro del proyecto Datos, indicadores,información y conocimiento de la innovación en Colombia, realizado también en susrespectivas regiones por las universidades Eafit, Surcolombiana y Tecnológica de Bolívar.El artículo examina las buenas prácticas de innovación (BPI) en un grupo representativode empresas, clasificadas así: productoras de bienes y prestadoras de servicios, de lossectores de producción (Agroindustria, Manufactura y Textil-confección) y de servicios(Turismo, TIC, Salud y Transporte) en Boyacá, particularmente de las ciudades deTunja, Paipa, Duitama y Sogamoso; examen hecho a partir de la autoevaluación de losempresarios sobre innovación en productos o servicios, procesos, gestión y mercado. Losresultados muestran que el grupo de PYMES considerado, está en su mayoría en una etapade despegue o desarrollo, con brechas importantes en los cuatro tipos de innovación. Exploratory study on good practices for innovation in a group of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMes) in Boyaca This article shows results of the research done in boyacá by the Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia named Innovation Data, Indicators, Information and Knowledge in Colombia, which was expanded to diverse regions of the country by the Universities Eafit, Surcolombiana and Tecnológica de bolívar. This text also presents the good innovation practices in a representative group of SMEs, which were classified as producers of goods and services, and belonged to the industrial (agroindustry, manufacturing and textiles) and service (tourism, IT, health and transportation) sectors in boyacá, especially in the cities of Tunja, Paipa, Duitama and Sogamoso. The innovation valuation was made based on entrepreneur self-assessment of their products, services, processes, management and market. The results indicate that the SMEs group is considered to be in a stage of development, and that present relevant gaps in the four types of innovation.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
- M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000475:011770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Heiner Mercado Percia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaeafco.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.