IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000180/017796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gestión de riesgos corporativos: percepción de los Chief risk officers

Author

Listed:
  • Leandro Marques
  • Suzana Habitzreuter Muller
  • Márcia Zanievicz da Silva

Abstract

El objetivo de este artículo fue verificar cómo la gestión de riesgos se materializa en las organizaciones. Para ello, se realizó una investigación descriptiva con un enfoque cuantitativo por medio de encuesta. El instrumento de recolección de datos consistía en un cuestionario estructurado enviado a Chief risk officers (CROs) de empresas brasilenas, auditores y consultores de gestión de riesgos. Un total de 22 respuestas fueron obtenidas. El análisis de los datos revela que entre los entrevistados existe poco conocimiento acerca de los trabajos relacionados con la gestión de riesgos presentados en la investigación, lo cual indica un uso escaso de estos trabajos como estrategias de capacitación para los CROs. En cuanto a las herramientas y técnicas de gestión de riesgos, se constató que las técnicas senaladas por el COSO (2007) son poco utilizadas por los encuestados, mientras que las más utilizadas son las que son menos complicadas en su aplicación. Con respecto a los motivos detrás de la adopción de GRC en una empresa, el más común fue su exigencia por parte de órganos reguladores. ****** The purpose of this paper is to verify how risk management materializes in organizations. To do this, a descriptive research was conducted with a quantitative approach by means of a survey. The data collection instrument was a structured questionnaire sent to the Chief Risk Officers (CROs) of Brazilian companies, auditors and risk management consultants. A total of 22 responses were obtained. Data analysis reveals that –among those interviewed– there is little knowledge about work related to the risk management presented in the research; this indicates a scarce use of this work as training strategies for CROs. Concerning tools and risk management techniques, it was found that the techniques identified by COSO (2007) are rarely used by respondents, while the most used are those less complicated to implement. Among the reasons behind GRC adoption in a company, the most common reason was by request of regulatory bodies. ****** O objetivo deste artigo foi verificar como a gestao de riscos se materializa nas organizacoes. Para tanto, realizou-se pesquisa descritiva com abordagem quantitativa por meio de levantamento. O instrumento de coleta de dados compreendeu um questionário estruturado enviado a CROs de empresas brasileiras, auditores e consultores de gestao de riscos. Um total de 22 respostas foi obtido. A análise dos dados revela que há pouco conhecimento por parte dos entrevistados sobre as obras que versam sobre gestao de riscos apresentadas na pesquisa, indicando assim pouca utilizacao destas como estratégias de capacitacao pelos CROs. Em relacao as ferramentas e técnicas de gestao de riscos, constatou-se que as técnicas elencadas pelo COSO (2007) sao pouco utilizadas pelos respondentes, sendo que as mais utilizadas sao as de menor complexidade de aplicacao. Em relacao aos motivos para a adocao da GRC na empresa, o mais recorrente foi a exigencia por parte de órgaos reguladores.

Suggested Citation

  • Leandro Marques & Suzana Habitzreuter Muller & Márcia Zanievicz da Silva, 2019. "Gestión de riesgos corporativos: percepción de los Chief risk officers," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 27(2), pages 105-126, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:col:000180:017796
    DOI: 10.18359/rfce.3932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.18359/rfce.3932
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18359/rfce.3932?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gestión de riesgos; GRC; Gestión de conocimiento; Chief Risk Officer; CRO;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000180:017796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Administrador (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femngco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.