IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v8y2023i3p224-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Sustainability and Alexander’s Living Structure Through a New Kind of City Science

Author

Listed:
  • Tarina Levin

    (Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science, University of Gävle, Sweden)

  • Stefan Sjöberg

    (Department of Social Work and Criminology, University of Gävle, Sweden)

  • Bin Jiang

    (Thrust of Urban Governance and Design, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), China)

  • Stephan Barthel

    (Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science, University of Gävle, Sweden / Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden)

Abstract

The disputed endorsement of inherited visceral and universal aesthetic preferences justifies the scientific validity of Alexander’s living structure. Apart from implying a resource-efficient way to promote well-being through urban design, the premise favors a collective approach to human self-perception and social justice. To better understand the contributions of Alexander, this article explores current knowledge about visceral and universal aesthetic preferences for living structure and if and how the new kind of city science, a mathematical model describing living structure, can be used for further testing. It also elaborates on the social impact of living structure, including its premise, and the potential of the new kind of city science to support social sustainability. A literature synthesis on living structure, the new kind of city science, and the premise showed a positive link between well-being and exposure to living structure. Limitations in research design nevertheless precluded conclusions about the associated visceral and universal aesthetic preferences. The new kind of city science was found appropriate for further research by holistically representing living structure. Moreover, like the hypothesized biological origin, social learning and sociocultural transmission were found to theoretically support the premise of universality and a collective approach to human identity and social justice, with further societal implications. For the concept of living structure to support social sustainability, it must be coupled with the promotion of empowerment and community mobilization. Hence, the operationalization of the new kind of city science should align with Alexander’s call for bottom-up approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarina Levin & Stefan Sjöberg & Bin Jiang & Stephan Barthel, 2023. "Social Sustainability and Alexander’s Living Structure Through a New Kind of City Science," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 224-234.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:8:y:2023:i:3:p:224-234
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6841
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleonora Gullone, 2000. "The Biophilia Hypothesis and Life in the 21st Century: Increasing Mental Health or Increasing Pathology?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 293-322, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael W. Mehaffy & Tigran Haas, 2023. "Introduction: Toward a “Post-Alexandrian” Agenda," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 148-152.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carter, Virginia & Derudder, Ben & Henríquez, Cristián, 2021. "Assessing local governments’ perception of the potential implementation of biophilic urbanism in Chile: A latent class approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. B. Grinde, 2002. "Happiness in the Perspective of Evolutionary Psychology," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 331-354, December.
    3. Cora Wagner & Undine E. Lang & Karin Hediger, 2019. "“There Is a Cat on Our Ward”: Inpatient and Staff Member Attitudes toward and Experiences with Cats in a Psychiatric Ward," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-10, August.
    4. Nancy R. Gee & Taylor Reed & April Whiting & Erika Friedmann & Donna Snellgrove & Katherine A. Sloman, 2019. "Observing Live Fish Improves Perceptions of Mood, Relaxation and Anxiety, But Does Not Consistently Alter Heart Rate or Heart Rate Variability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Yannick Joye, 2006. "An Interdisciplinary Argument for Natural Morphologies in Architectural Design," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(2), pages 239-252, April.
    6. Helen Berry & Kathryn Bowen & Tord Kjellstrom, 2010. "Climate change and mental health: a causal pathways framework," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 55(2), pages 123-132, April.
    7. Jeffrey Jacob & Emily Jovic & Merlin Brinkerhoff, 2009. "Personal and Planetary Well-being: Mindfulness Meditation, Pro-environmental Behavior and Personal Quality of Life in a Survey from the Social Justice and Ecological Sustainability Movement," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 93(2), pages 275-294, September.
    8. Yarantseva Marina, 2019. "Biophilic cities as a key to sustainability: a case study of Oslo," Prosperitas, Budapest Business University, vol. 6(3), pages 57-65.
    9. Elizabeth Nisbet & John Zelenski & Steven Murphy, 2011. "Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 303-322, April.
    10. Cathrin Rothkopf & Silke Schworm, 2021. "Exploring Dog-Assisted Interventions in Higher Education: Students’ Attitudes and Perceived Effects on Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Nick Taylor Buck, 2017. "The art of imitating life: The potential contribution of biomimicry in shaping the future of our cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(1), pages 120-140, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:8:y:2023:i:3:p:224-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.