IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v8y2023i1p283-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Gentrification, Social Justice, and Climate Change in the Literature: Conceptual Origins and Future Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Cucca

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning (BYREG), Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway)

  • Michael Friesenecker

    (Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering (IAN), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria)

  • Thomas Thaler

    (Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering (IAN), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Austria)

Abstract

While global urban development is increasingly oriented towards strategies to facilitate green urbanism, potential community trade-offs are largely overlooked. This article presents the findings of a quantitative and qualitative meta-analysis of the current literature on green gentrification (the process leading the implementation of an environmental planning agenda displacing or excluding the most economically vulnerable population) in connection with climate change adaptation and mitigation across the globe. Based on specific keywords, we selected the recorded entry of 212 articles from Scopus covering the period 1977–2021. Our review focused on the historical and geographical development of the literature on urban greening and gentrification. The analysis shows that the concept of green gentrification has strong roots within the environmental justice debate in the US. In terms of intervention, most studies focused on urban parks and trees and were primarily oriented towards restoration. However, debates around the role of green facades, green roofs, or blue infrastructure (such as ponds and rivers) and other nature-based solutions as a driver for green gentrification are few and far between. Finally, we also identified a strong gap between the observation of green gentrification and potential countermeasures that respond to it. Most studies suggest that the existence of a stronger collaborative planning process within the affected communities may overcome the challenge of green gentrification. Based on our results, we identify several gaps and new research directions to design a green and just city.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Cucca & Michael Friesenecker & Thomas Thaler, 2023. "Green Gentrification, Social Justice, and Climate Change in the Literature: Conceptual Origins and Future Directions," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 283-295.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:1:p:283-295
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v8i1.6129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6129
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v8i1.6129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamil Pearsall & Isabelle Anguelovski, 2016. "Contesting and Resisting Environmental Gentrification: Responses to New Paradoxes and Challenges for Urban Environmental Justice," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(3), pages 121-127, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Azadgar, Anahita & Luciani, Giulia & Nyka, Lucyna, 2025. "Spatial allocation of nature-based solutions in the form of public green infrastructure in relation to the socio-economic district profile–a GIS-based comparative study of Gdańsk and Rome," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Roberta Cucca & Thomas Thaler, 2023. "Social Justice in the Green City," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 279-282.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Viniece Jennings & Alessandro Rigolon, 2021. "Green Gentrification and Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Juliana A. Maantay & Andrew R. Maroko, 2018. "Brownfields to Greenfields: Environmental Justice Versus Environmental Gentrification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Alfonso Gallego-Valadés & Francisco Ródenas-Rigla & Jorge Garcés-Ferrer, 2020. "Approach to Urban Environmental Justice Using Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis. The Case of Valencia’s Monumental Trees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Feicui Gou & Wenya Zhai & Zilin Wang, 2023. "Visualizing the Landscape of Green Gentrification: A Bibliometric Analysis and Future Directions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, July.
    5. Kristina Mjörnell & Paula Femenías & Kerstin Annadotter, 2019. "Renovation Strategies for Multi-Residential Buildings from the Record Years in Sweden—Profit-Driven or Socioeconomically Responsible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Lena Ali & Annegret Haase & Stefan Heiland, 2020. "Gentrification through Green Regeneration? Analyzing the Interaction between Inner-City Green Space Development and Neighborhood Change in the Context of Regrowth: The Case of Lene-Voigt-Park in Leipz," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Alessandro Rigolon & Jeremy Németh, 2020. "Green gentrification or ‘just green enough’: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 402-420, February.
    8. Roberta Cucca & Michael Friesenecker & Thomas Thaler, 2023. "Green Gentrification, Social Justice, and Climate Change in the Literature: Conceptual Origins and Future Directions," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 283-295.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:1:p:283-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.