IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v7y2022i4p75-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Space Usage and Well-Being: Participatory Action Research With Vulnerable Groups in Hyper-Dense Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Y. S. Cheung

    (School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

  • Danyang Lei

    (School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

  • Faye Y. F. Chan

    (Institute of Future Cities, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

  • Hendrik Tieben

    (School of Architecture, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

Abstract

The importance of neighbourhood-level public space and its benefits have been discussed at large during the Covid-19 pandemic. While demands for public space increase, restrictions imposed by the containment policies such as social distancing and public space use have made profound health impacts on the general public. Such impact may further widen the gaps of existing health and social inequalities and engender well-being issues in vulnerable populations living in dense urban environments. To better understand vulnerable groups’ perception and experience of access to public spaces and its association with well-being, we conducted participatory action research during the pandemic (October 2020 to April 2021) via surveys, focus group discussions, mapping, and co-creation workshops in Sham Shui Po, a hyper-dense and poverty-stricken district in Hong Kong. Participants reported demands for public space use and its significance to well-being and pointed to several environmental and social factors that hindered their usage, including perceived safety, hygiene concerns, and issues between different genders and ethnic groups in the neighbourhood. Pandemic-containment measures and the fear of infections may contribute to heightened anxiety and stress to some degree among the participants. Directions for local interventions of spatial improvement were identified. Our study further highlights the strength of participatory action research for the development of more user-oriented planning solutions and the potential of community mapping and co-creation activities to empower vulnerable groups and enhance their spatial competence.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Y. S. Cheung & Danyang Lei & Faye Y. F. Chan & Hendrik Tieben, 2022. "Public Space Usage and Well-Being: Participatory Action Research With Vulnerable Groups in Hyper-Dense Environments," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 75-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:7:y:2022:i:4:p:75-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5764
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yueyi Tan & Jusheng Song & Lei Yu & Yunxi Bai & Jianfeng Zhang & Man-Ha (Sylvia) Chan & Jeroen van Ameijde, 2024. "The Mechanism of Street Markets Fostering Supportive Communities in Old Urban Districts: A Case Study of Sham Shui Po, Hong Kong," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:7:y:2022:i:4:p:75-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.