IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v4y2019i1p19-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Situational Understanding of Collective Learning: A Reflexive Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Seppe De Blust

    (Research Unit Planning and Development, Department of Architecture, KU Leuven, Belgium)

  • Oswald Devisch

    (Department of Architecture & Art, University of Hasselt, Belgium)

  • Jan Schreurs

    (Research Unit Planning and Development, Department of Architecture, KU Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

Based on an in-depth study of how socially innovative processes are collectively reinforced within two cases, this article builds a reflexive framework that conceptualizes socially innovative processes as situated trajectories of collective learning. The framework starts from three theories in the field of pedagogy and organisational studies that try to contextualise and operationalise how internal processes of learning, supportive relationships and external demands interrelate withinprocesses of collective learning. In line with the reflexive character of social innovation research, the article presents the framework as a means to give concrete answer on how socially innovative processes can be supported and how the dynamic character of their collective learning trajectories can be managed. The conclusion of this article further reflects on the importance of a situational and multi-layered understanding of collective learning for creating institutional support for socially innovative processes in planning and presents reflexive questions that can help external actors as planning practitioners to position themselves within this often messy and complex reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Seppe De Blust & Oswald Devisch & Jan Schreurs, 2019. "Towards a Situational Understanding of Collective Learning: A Reflexive Framework," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 19-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:19-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/1673
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Moulaert & Jacques Nussbaumer, 2005. "Defining the Social Economy and its Governance at the Neighbourhood Level: A Methodological Reflection," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 2071-2088, October.
    2. Patsy Healey, 2013. "Learning the city: Knowledge and translocal assemblage," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 283-285, June.
    3. Loris Servillo & Jan Schreurs, 2013. "Pragmatism and Research by Design: Epistemological Virtues and Methodological Challenges," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3-4), pages 358-371, November.
    4. Frank Moulaert & Flavia Martinelli & Erik Swyngedouw & Sara Gonzalez, 2005. "Towards Alternative Model(s) of Local Innovation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(11), pages 1969-1990, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carmelina Bevilacqua & Yapeng Ou & Pasquale Pizzimenti & Guglielmo Minervino, 2019. "New Public Institutional Forms and Social Innovation in Urban Governance: Insights from the “Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics” (MONUM) in Boston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Andries, Petra & Daou, Alain & Verheyden, Laura, 2019. "Innovation as a vehicle for improving socially vulnerable groups’ access to basic provisions: A research note on the development of a questionnaire module," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 281-288.
    3. Justus Uitermark, 2014. "Integration and Control: The Governing of Urban Marginality in Western Europe," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 1418-1436, July.
    4. Paul Windrum & Doris Schartinger & Luis Rubalcaba & Faiz F. Gallouj & Marja Toivonen, 2016. "The co-creation of multi-agent social innovations," Post-Print halshs-01322603, HAL.
    5. Raissa Ulbrich & Claudia Pahl-Wostl, 2019. "The German Permaculture Community from a Community of Practice Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Frank Moulaert & Barbara Van Dyck & Ahmed Z. Khan & Jan Schreurs, 2013. "Building a Meta-Framework to 'Address' Spatial Quality," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3-4), pages 389-409, November.
    7. van der Have, Robert P. & Rubalcaba, Luis, 2016. "Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9), pages 1923-1935.
    8. Sergey Mikhailovich Vasin & Leyla Ayvarovna Gamidullaeva & Tamara Kerimovna Rostovskaya, 2017. "The Challenge of Social Innovation: Approaches and Key Mechanisms of Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 25-45.
    9. Kampelmann, Stephan & Van Hollebeke, Sarah & Vandergert, Paula, 2016. "Stuck in the middle with you: The role of bridging organisations in urban regeneration," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 82-93.
    10. Lydia Zepeda & Anna Reznickova, 2017. "Innovative millennial snails: the story of Slow Food University of Wisconsin," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(1), pages 167-178, March.
    11. Hiteva, Ralitsa & Sovacool, Benjamin, 2017. "Harnessing social innovation for energy justice: A business model perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 631-639.
    12. Norbert Laurisz, 2019. "The Role of Stakeholders in Development of Social Economy Organizations in Poland: An Integrative Approach," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Eun Sun Lee & Kyujin Jung, 2018. "Dynamics of social economy self-organized on social media: following social entrepreneur forum and social economy network on Facebook," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 635-651, March.
    14. Jason Lortie & Kevin C. Cox, 2018. "On the boundaries of social entrepreneurship: a review of relationships with related research domains," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 639-648, September.
    15. Wenyuan Li & Mohammed Abubakari Sadick & Abdul-Aziz Ibn Musah & Salisu Mustapha, 2018. "The Moderating Effect of Social Innovation in Perspectives of Shared Value Creation in the Educational Sector of Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, November.
    16. Joutsenvirta, Maria, 2016. "A practice approach to the institutionalization of economic degrowth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 23-32.
    17. Dachs, Bernhard, 2017. "The impact of new technologies on the labour market and the social economy," MPRA Paper 90519, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Gianluca Misuraca & Csaba Kucsera & Giulio Pasi & Dimitri Gagliardi & Fabienne Abadie, 2017. "Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation initiatives promoting social investment across the EU: IESI Knowledge Map 2016," JRC Research Reports JRC105556, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Cace, Sorin, 2010. "Good Practices in Social Economy in Greece and in Other States of the European Union," MPRA Paper 79940, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Fedulkin, D.P. (Федулкин, Д.П.) & Cherchenko, O.V. (Черченко, О.В.), 2019. "Trace of the effect of social innovation in patent data [След Эффекта Социальной Инновации В Патентных Данных]," Economy of science, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 5, pages 277-302, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:4:y:2019:i:1:p:19-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.