IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v1y2016i2p114-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizen-Centric Urban Planning through Extracting Emotion Information from Twitter in an Interdisciplinary Space-Time-Linguistics Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Bernd Resch

    (Department of Geoinformatics - Z_GIS, University of Salzburg, Austria; Center for Geographic Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA and Institute of Geography (GIScience), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Anja Summa

    (Department of Computational Linguistics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Peter Zeile

    (Computergestützte Planungs und Entwurfsmethoden (CPE), University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany)

  • Michael Strube

    (NLP Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies gGmbH, Heidelberg, Germany)

Abstract

Traditional urban planning processes typically happen in offices and behind desks. Modern types of civic participation can enhance those processes by acquiring citizens’ ideas and feedback in participatory sensing approaches like “People as Sensors”. As such, citizen-centric planning can be achieved by analysing Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) data such as Twitter tweets and posts from other social media channels. These user-generated data comprise several information dimensions, such as spatial and temporal information, and textual content. However, in previous research, these dimensions were generally examined separately in single-disciplinary approaches, which does not allow for holistic conclusions in urban planning. This paper introduces TwEmLab, an interdisciplinary approach towards extracting citizens’ emotions in different locations within a city. More concretely, we analyse tweets in three dimensions (space, time, and linguistics), based on similarities between each pair of tweets as defined by a specific set of functional relationships in each dimension. We use a graph-based semi-supervised learning algorithm to classify the data into discrete emotions (happiness, sadness, fear, anger/disgust, none). Our proposed solution allows tweets to be classified into emotion classes in a multi-parametric approach. Additionally, we created a manually annotated gold standard that can be used to evaluate TwEmLab’s performance. Our experimental results show that we are able to identify tweets carrying emotions and that our approach bears extensive potential to reveal new insights into citizens’ perceptions of the city.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernd Resch & Anja Summa & Peter Zeile & Michael Strube, 2016. "Citizen-Centric Urban Planning through Extracting Emotion Information from Twitter in an Interdisciplinary Space-Time-Linguistics Algorithm," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 114-127.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:114-127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/617
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen Roberts & Bernd Resch & Jon Sadler & Lee Chapman & Andreas Petutschnig & Stefan Zimmer, 2018. "Investigating the Emotional Responses of Individuals to Urban Green Space Using Twitter Data: A Critical Comparison of Three Different Methods of Sentiment Analysis," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 21-33.
    2. Fernando Santa & Roberto Henriques & Joaquín Torres-Sospedra & Edzer Pebesma, 2019. "A Statistical Approach for Studying the Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Geolocated Tweets in Urban Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Sveta Milusheva & Robert Marty & Guadalupe Bedoya & Sarah Williams & Elizabeth Resor & Arianna Legovini, 2021. "Applying machine learning and geolocation techniques to social media data (Twitter) to develop a resource for urban planning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, February.
    4. Pilvi Nummi, 2018. "Crowdsourcing Local Knowledge with PPGIS and Social Media for Urban Planning to Reveal Intangible Cultural Heritage," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 100-115.
    5. Kim, Daehwan & Seo, Ducksu & Kwon, Youngsang, 2021. "Novel trends in SNS customers in food and beverage patronage: An empirical study of metropolitan cities in South Korea," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    6. Raquel Pérez‐delHoyo & Higinio Mora & José Manuel Nolasco‐Vidal & Rubén Abad‐Ortiz & Rafael A. Mollá‐Sirvent, 2021. "Addressing new challenges in smart urban planning using Information and Communication Technologies," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 342-354, May.
    7. Ruixue Liu & Jing Xiao, 2020. "Factors Affecting Users’ Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Yong Gao & Yuanyuan Chen & Lan Mu & Shize Gong & Pengcheng Zhang & Yu Liu, 2022. "Measuring urban sentiments from social media data: a dual-polarity metric approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 199-221, April.
    9. Bernd Resch & Inga Puetz & Matthias Bluemke & Kalliopi Kyriakou & Jakob Miksch, 2020. "An Interdisciplinary Mixed-Methods Approach to Analyzing Urban Spaces: The Case of Urban Walkability and Bikeability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Anna Kovacs-Gyori & Alina Ristea & Clemens Havas & Bernd Resch & Pablo Cabrera-Barona, 2018. "#London2012: Towards Citizen-Contributed Urban Planning Through Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 75-99.
    11. Ghasem Javadi & Mohammad Taleai, 2020. "Integration of User Generated Geo-contents and Official Data to Assess Quality of Life in Intra-national Level," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 205-235, November.
    12. Ourania Kounadi & Bernd Resch & Andreas Petutschnig, 2018. "Privacy Threats and Protection Recommendations for the Use of Geosocial Network Data in Research," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Higinio Mora & Raquel Pérez-delHoyo & José F. Paredes-Pérez & Rafael A. Mollá-Sirvent, 2018. "Analysis of Social Networking Service Data for Smart Urban Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Yichen Yang & Shifeng Fang & Hua Wu & Jiaqiang Du & Haomiao Tu & Wei He, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Trends and Driving Factors of Urban Livability in the Yangtze River Delta Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:114-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.