Author
Listed:
- Fenna Imara Hoefsloot
(Department of Geography, University College London, UK)
- Oksana Zaporozhets
(Georg Simmel Center for Urban Studies, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany / Institute for Regional Geography (IfL), Germany)
- Annegret Haase
(Department of Urban and Environmental Sociology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Germany)
- Valeria Lazarenko
(Georg Simmel Center for Urban Studies, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany / University of Hamburg, Germany)
- Moritz Kasper
(German Environment Agency (UBA), Germany)
Abstract
Disruptions increasingly constitute urban futures by interrupting established trajectories and influencing how cities are imagined, planned, and realised. This article challenges the prevailing assumption that urban disruption merely produces social fragmentation and catastrophic futures, positioning it instead as a catalyst for progressive urban transformation. Although disruption is widely discussed across politics, management, technology, and infrastructure, these discussions remain compartmentalised. Rather than adopting sector‐specific perspectives, we propose an urban‐centred framework to understand how disruptions converge and manifest within cities. The article examines how disruption functions to destabilise established thought patterns, revealing how the city operates and how urban actors might think and do the city differently. Drawing on diverse examples, this conceptual intervention highlights disruption’s capacity to create openings for innovation, creativity, and transformative change while acknowledging its potential for ambivalent outcomes. By revisiting existing scholarship on disruption, we argue for studying disruption in relation to the transformations it produces in agency, power relations, imaginaries, and future‐making. The potential of disruption to elevate marginalised voices, expand epistemic resources, and foster collective action toward better urban futures is examined. Disruption is thus reclaimed as a political and creative force—one that reorients urban research from diagnosing fragmentation toward exploring pathways for hopeful, collective, and democratic urban futures amid and through disruption.
Suggested Citation
Fenna Imara Hoefsloot & Oksana Zaporozhets & Annegret Haase & Valeria Lazarenko & Moritz Kasper, 2026.
"Reclaiming Disruption: Pathways to Hopeful Urban Futures,"
Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:urbpla:v11:y:2026:a:11708
DOI: 10.17645/up.11708
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v11:y:2026:a:11708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.