IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v11y2026a11081.html

Shrinkage as an Opportunity? Local Cultures, Power Structures, and Spaces of Possibility in Two Communities in Lusatia

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Erhard

    (Department of Social Sciences, University of Siegen, Germany)

  • Silvia Mann

    (Zittau/Görlitz University of Applied Sciences, Germany)

  • Emilia Socha

    (International Institute (IHI) Zittau, Dresden University of Technology, Germany)

  • Julian Borchard

    (Wandelwerk, University of Applied Sciences Münster, Germany)

Abstract

Building on the diagnosis of urban shrinkage, we examine how two cities in Lusatia are dealing with the challenges of structural change. Adopting the concept of “spaces of possibility” (SoP), we view shrinkage as a dynamic phenomenon that holds both risks and opportunities for urban development and is moderated by local actors, which can lead to conflicts of varying degrees. Using two qualitative case studies in the municipalities of “Rabenfurt” and “Ostenau,” we show that historical backgrounds, established cultures, and patterns of decision‐making are particularly decisive factors in this regard. Rabenfurt represents a top‐down logic with a focus on economic development, which tends to marginalise citizens’ opinions. Ostenau is characterised by a bottom‐up perspective, actively involving local initiatives and citizens in decision‐making processes. However, the created status quo in Ostenau is fragile. The results emphasise that local cultures and modes of decision‐making should be taken into consideration when applying the concept of SoP.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Erhard & Silvia Mann & Emilia Socha & Julian Borchard, 2026. "Shrinkage as an Opportunity? Local Cultures, Power Structures, and Spaces of Possibility in Two Communities in Lusatia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v11:y:2026:a:11081
    DOI: 10.17645/up.11081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/11081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.11081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v11:y:2026:a:11081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.