IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v10y2025a9913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collective Resources of Social Reproduction and Care? Potentialities and Limitations of Urban Initiatives of Commensality

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Verwey

    (Department of Human Geography, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Rivka Saltiel

    (Department of Geography and Regional Science, University of Graz, Austria)

Abstract

Urban initiatives of commensality (UICs) form micro‐public spaces where people meet, cook together, and share a meal. UICs thereby address both social needs for encounter, care, and community as well as material needs for (free) food. As lived examples of caring‐with, UICs resist neoliberal individualisation, privatisation, and marketisation and experiment with alternative ways of being and relating in common. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in a neighbourhood centre in the city of Graz, Austria, this article explores the practices and social relations of a weekly communal lunch and asks about the potentialities and limitations of UICs as collective resources of social reproduction and care in the city. The analysis is guided by feminist care ethics and social reproduction theory and emphasises, first, the organisational structure and the central role of the employees as curators of this commensal context, second, the caring‐with relations that are established by being and doing in common, and, third, the ambiguous socio‐spatial divisions of labour, both within the UIC and beyond. This contribution extends existing debates of commensality with a feminist analysis of micro‐public curated commensal contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Verwey & Rivka Saltiel, 2025. "Collective Resources of Social Reproduction and Care? Potentialities and Limitations of Urban Initiatives of Commensality," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9913
    DOI: 10.17645/up.9913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/9913
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.9913?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.