Author
Listed:
- Ana Maria Moral Mora
(Department of Research Methods and Educational Diagnosis, University of Valencia, Spain)
- Inmaculada Chiva
(Department of Research Methods and Educational Diagnosis, University of Valencia, Spain)
- Carmen Lloret‐Catala
(Department of Comparative Education and Education History, University of Valencia, Spain)
Abstract
European universities must face the challenge of diversity and design inclusive practices to address it as part of their social responsibility. However, not all universities are doing the same in terms of diversity practices, so it is important to gather the perceptions of the protagonists. To this end, we have analysed university faculty’s perceptions using a mixed model with a concurrent methodological strategy, including an ad hoc questionnaire validated with 880 educators, as well as 17 semi‐structured interviews. The triangulation of these two instruments allowed us to analyse three key dimensions associated with the idea of attention to diversity in the university: diversity concept or culture, policies and programmes of the institution, and inclusive educational practices. The conclusion is that faculty members are positively predisposed to get involved in the process of attention to diversity in all three dimensions, especially in the design of inclusive teaching practices such as the UDL (universal design for learning), although they do point out that it is important to systematise diversity policies in research, innovation, and teaching to keep promoting the social commitment and responsibility of higher education institutions.
Suggested Citation
Ana Maria Moral Mora & Inmaculada Chiva & Carmen Lloret‐Catala, 2021.
"Faculty Perception of Inclusion in the University: Concept, Policies and Educational Practices,"
Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 106-116.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:socinc:v9:y:2021:i:3:p:106-116
DOI: 10.17645/si.v9i3.4114
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v9:y:2021:i:3:p:106-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.