IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v7y2019i2p74-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solidarity as a Field of Political Contention: Insights from Local Reception Realities

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Haselbacher

    (Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Reception realities are marked by contentious moves and a strong degree of politicization. Claims made for the inclusion/exclusion of asylum seekers frame the activities of local solidarity initiatives. Based on a set of data on newly opened accommodation centres since 2015 as well as comparative case studies conducted in small-scale and predominantly rural municipalities in Austria, this research explores the characteristics and manifestations of solidarity in the context of asylum. Results show how claims of solidarity are under pressure as they are deeply rooted in exclusionary frames of deservingness on the one hand and federal disputes about the adequate management of asylum systems on the other.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam Haselbacher, 2019. "Solidarity as a Field of Political Contention: Insights from Local Reception Realities," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 74-84.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:74-84
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1975
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakob Eder, 2019. "Innovation in the Periphery: A Critical Survey and Research Agenda," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 42(2), pages 119-146, March.
    2. Elie Michel, 2014. "Exclusive Solidarity? Radical Right Parties and the Welfare State," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers p0417, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    3. Sara de Jong & Ilker Ataç, 2017. "Demand and Deliver: Refugee Support Organisations in Austria," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 28-37.
    4. Jeroen Doomernik & Djoeke Ardon, 2018. "The City as an Agent of Refugee Integration," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 91-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robin Vandevoordt & Gert Verschraegen, 2019. "The European Refugee Controversy: Civil Solidarity, Cultural Imaginaries and Political Change," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 48-52.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Kousis & Maria Paschou & Angelos Loukakis, 2021. "Transnational Solidarity Organisations and their Main Features, before and since 2008: Adaptive and/or Autonomous?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 672-694, September.
    2. Frank Eckardt, 2018. "European Cities Planning for Asylum," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 61-63.
    3. Eli Auslender, 2022. "Multi-level Governance in Refugee Housing and Integration Policy: a Model of Best Practice in Leverkusen," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 949-970, September.
    4. Eberhard Raithelhuber, 2019. "Rearranging Differential Inclusion through Civic Solidarity: Loose Coupling in Mentorship for “Unaccompanied Minors”," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 149-164.
    5. Robert Larruina & Kees Boersma & Elena Ponzoni, 2019. "Responding to the Dutch Asylum Crisis: Implications for Collaborative Work between Civil Society and Governmental Organizations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 53-63.
    6. Eva Youkhana & Ove Sutter, 2017. "Perspectives on the European Border Regime: Mobilization, Contestation and the Role of Civil Society," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 1-6.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:7:y:2019:i:2:p:74-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.