IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v6y2018i2p22-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Theorising Disability Care (Non-)Personalisation in European Countries: Comparing Personal Assistance Schemes in Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Tschanz

    (Division of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, University of Fribourg, Switzerland)

Abstract

This article examines four European countries (Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) with respect to their degree of disability care personalisation. The approach is embedded in a broader theoretical analysis, which in turn is inspired by the notion of bivalent social justice as presented by Nancy Fraser (2003). The theoretical argument is that claims for personal assistance are part of a broader movement toward emancipation. However, it is argued that the specific settings of welfare regimes provide structures that empower or mitigate the possible implementation of personal assistance schemes. The author argues that conservative-corporatist welfare regimes provide less-supportive opportunity structures for policy change pertaining to personal assistance than other welfare regimes. This heuristic argument is developed further by looking more closely at key figures of Sweden, Germany, and the United Kingdom as being ideal-typical welfare regime cases. Furthermore, the case of Switzerland is outlined in an in-depth manner as it seems to have conservative-corporatist characteristics regarding the organisation of disability care while simultaneously being difficult to theorise. It is the aim of this article to serve as a first heuristic undertaking for analysing the low level of disability care personalisation in certain continental European cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Tschanz, 2018. "Theorising Disability Care (Non-)Personalisation in European Countries: Comparing Personal Assistance Schemes in Switzerland, Germany, Sweden, and the United Kingdom," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 22-33.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:22-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1318
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin Samuel & Andreas Hadjar, 2016. "How Welfare-State Regimes Shape Subjective Well-Being Across Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(2), pages 565-587, November.
    2. Rossella Ciccia, 2017. "A two-step approach for the analysis of hybrids in comparative social policy analysis: a nuanced typology of childcare between policies and regimes," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2761-2780, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juan Andrés Pino-Morán & Pía Rodríguez-Garrido & María Soledad Burrone, 2023. "Politico-Epistemic Tensions Regarding Personal Assistance and Care for People with Disabilities: An Integrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naoki Akaeda, 2020. "Contextual Social Trust and Well-Being Inequality: From the Perspectives of Education and Income," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(8), pages 2957-2979, December.
    2. Attila Bartha & Violetta Zentai, 2020. "Long-Term Care and Gender Equality: Fuzzy-Set Ideal Types of Care Regimes in Europe," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 92-102.
    3. Mojca Svetek & Mateja Drnovsek, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Types of Early-Stage Entrepreneurial Activity on Subjective Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 149-170, January.
    4. Lu Yang & Yong-Zhan Zheng & Hsiao-Hsien Lin & I-Shen Chen & Kuan-Yu Chen & Qi-Yuan Li & I-En Tsai, 2023. "Under the Risk of COVID-19 Epidemic: A Study on the Influence of Life Attitudes, Leisure Sports Values, and Workplace Risk Perceptions on Urban Development and Public Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Bertin, Giovanni & Carrino, Ludovico & Pantalone, Marta, 2021. "Do standard classifications still represent European welfare typologies? Novel evidence from studies on health and social care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    6. Robert Ribanszki & Katie S Taylor & Johanna Scheutzow & Jose Andres Saez Fonseca & Sonia Ponzo, 2022. "Welfare systems and mental health in OECD and EEA countries: a scoping review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Xiaojuan Ouyang & Zequan Pan, 2023. "Social Quality and Residents’ Subjective Well-Being in China—An Empirical Analysis Based on CSS2021 Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-13, September.
    8. Imma Cortès-Franch & Vanessa Puig-Barrachina & Hernán Vargas-Leguás & M. Marta Arcas & Lucía Artazcoz, 2019. "Is Being Employed Always Better for Mental Wellbeing Than Being Unemployed? Exploring the Role of Gender and Welfare State Regimes during the Economic Crisis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:6:y:2018:i:2:p:22-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.