IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v3y2015i5p5-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Roma Identity as an Expert-Political Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Mihai Surdu

    (Institute of Advanced Studies, Central European University, Hungary)

  • Martin Kovats

    (Independent Researcher)

Abstract

The creation of an EU Framework for national Roma integration strategies (2011) marks a significant step in the politicisation of Roma identity by ensuring a further increase in the number of initiatives, projects and programmes explicitly targeting Roma. The Framework itself is part of a process that began with postcommunist transition and which has produced historically unprecedented levels of Roma political activism along with a proliferation of national and transnational policy initiatives focussed on Roma identity. In seeking to explain this contemporary political phenomenon, the article argues that Roma is an identity constructed at the intersection of political and expert knowledge by various actors, such as policymakers, Romani activists, international organizations and scholars. This political-expert identity is applied to groups that are not bounded by a common language, religion, cultural practice, geographic location, occupation, physical appearance or lifestyle. The article explores how this collation of disparate populations into a notional political community builds upon a centuries-old Gypsy legacy. It scrutinizes five strands of identification practices that have contributed to the longue durée development of today’s Roma as an epistemic object and policy target: police profiling of particular communities; administrative surveys; Romani activism; Roma targeted policies; quantitative scientific research. The article argues that the contemporary economic and political conditions amidst which the politicisation of Roma identity is occurring explain how the ideological and institutional construction of the ethnic frame tends toward the reinforcement of the exclusion of those categorised as Roma, thus increasing the perceived need for Roma policy initiatives. A self-sustaining cycle has been created where Roma knowledge identifies Roma problems requiring a policy response, which produces more Roma knowledge, more needs and more policy responses. Yet, there are consequences to racialising public discourse by presenting Roma as both problematic and essentially different from everyone else. Hostility towards Roma has increased in many states indicating that the expert framing of Roma groupness affects social solidarity by disconnecting and distancing Roma from their fellow citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihai Surdu & Martin Kovats, 2015. "Roma Identity as an Expert-Political Construction," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(5), pages 5-18.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:3:y:2015:i:5:p:5-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/245
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jansen, J. H. C., 1969. "Introductory report," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 169-176, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janne Paulsen Breimo & Loreni Elena Baciu, 2016. "Romanian Roma: An Institutional Ethnography of Labour Market Exclusion," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 116-126.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tie, Caroline & Holden, Andrew & Park, Hyung yu, 2015. "A ‘reality of return’: The case of the Sarawakian-Chinese visiting China," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 206-212.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:3:y:2015:i:5:p:5-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.