IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v15y2027a12934.html

Articulating Citizenship for Blind Children: Tactile Literacy in Twentieth‐Century China

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Wang

    (School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China)

Abstract

This article examines the role of tactile literacy in articulating citizenship for blind children across three distinct phases of twentieth‐century China. It begins by tracing the localization of Braille systems through missionary schools since 1874. Missionary advocacy for tactile reading and writing aimed to cultivate religious inclusion, enabling blind children at the bottom of society to transcend economic survival. Beginning in 1927, the Nationalist state assumed control of education for the blind and made tactile literacy a criterion of blind citizenship. Within the social welfare system, civic instruction and manual training enabled blind children from a wider range of socioeconomic backgrounds to acquire social citizenship through tactile literacy. After 1949, the standardization of Chinese Braille as a lingua franca for “blind compatriots” ( mangbao ) facilitated blind children’s inclusion as socialist citizens through their participation in proletarian politics. Taken together, these three phases reveal how blindness was mediated through literacy ideologies promoted by religious, social, and political institutions, producing a language of blind citizenship grounded in Chinese understandings of disability, youth, marginality, and inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Wang, 2027. "Articulating Citizenship for Blind Children: Tactile Literacy in Twentieth‐Century China," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 15.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v15:y:2027:a:12934
    DOI: 10.17645/si.12934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/12934
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.12934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v15:y:2027:a:12934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.