IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v14y2026a12443.html

An Exploratory Quantitative Analysis of Black Formerly Incarcerated People’s Digital Literacy

Author

Listed:
  • Kaelyn Sanders

    (School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Arizona State University, USA)

  • Ariel Roddy

    (Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Northern Arizona University, USA)

Abstract

The reentry challenges that formerly incarcerated people (FIPs) face are well‐documented in prior research. However, the digital inequality this population faces has received less consideration in reentry research. In particular, there has been little research conducted to quantitatively assess FIPs’ digital literacy skills and their relationship with demographic and incarceration‐related variables. The current study is exploratory and addresses this limitation by using quantitative data from 73 Black FIPs in Michigan to examine relationships between their digital literacy, demographics, and incarceration‐related variables. The analyses conducted included bivariate correlations, ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions, and post hoc power analyses. The findings reveal that FIPs with more extensive incarceration histories fare worse in terms of the composite digital literacy scale and multiple digital literacy subscales. Age and disability status were also associated with specific digital literacy skill subtypes. These findings suggest that digital literacy skills are shaped by FIPs’ backgrounds, especially their incarceration histories. Thus, FIPs are experiencing a new “digital collateral consequence” of incarceration, resulting in structural barriers to reentry that must be addressed through policy and programming. However, because the posthoc power analysis found that the regression models were underpowered, the need for additional research replicating this study with larger and broader samples cannot be understated.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaelyn Sanders & Ariel Roddy, 2026. "An Exploratory Quantitative Analysis of Black Formerly Incarcerated People’s Digital Literacy," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:12443
    DOI: 10.17645/si.12443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/12443
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.12443?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:12443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.