IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v14y2026a12207.html

Who Cares About Fieldwork? A Person‐Centred Framework for a Compassionate Early‐Career Fieldwork Pedagogy

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Standen

    (Lancaster University Library, Lancaster University, UK)

  • Andy Harrod

    (School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Scotland)

Abstract

The concept of “fieldwork” has been subject to longstanding critique, particularly regarding unequal researcher–participant dynamics, and the extractive colonial legacies that shape knowledge produced in the “field.” Early‐career fieldworkers often operate within neoliberal, productivity‐driven norms that reproduce unequal researcher–participant dynamics in the field and leave little room for researcher care. This article proposes understanding fieldwork as an inherently relational, pedagogical process. We use person‐centred psychotherapy to advance a framework in which to understand fieldwork as a relational, pedagogical process. Building on vignettes from our experiences of ECR fieldwork, we outline three key pillars on which a compassionate fieldwork pedagogy can be built. These are (a) embedded institutional enablers that encourage care and compassion; (b) person‐centred care throughout the fieldwork process; and (c) researcher self‐awareness. We suggest that understanding fieldwork as a relational pedagogy, through core person‐centred psychotherapy principles, is an important first step in co‐creating compassionate fieldwork futures.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Standen & Andy Harrod, 2026. "Who Cares About Fieldwork? A Person‐Centred Framework for a Compassionate Early‐Career Fieldwork Pedagogy," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:12207
    DOI: 10.17645/si.12207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/12207
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.12207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:12207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.