IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v14y2026a11929.html

Re‐Imagining Inclusive and Compassionate Futures: Challenging the Bureaucracy of Disability Through Compassion

Author

Listed:
  • Stuart Read

    (School of Education, Bath Spa University, UK)

  • Anne Parfitt

    (School of Education, Bath Spa University, UK)

Abstract

Taken‐for‐granted societal capitalist bureaucracy whereby narrow definitions of human value are accepted without question or critique risks devaluing the embodiment of disability, and eroding attempts to build a caring and compassionate society. This article, written by two disabled academics, describes empirical data collected with eight disabled people and allies across two focus groups, in which we discussed how compassion, when viewed from a disability activist perspective, can allow for reimagined compassionate futures whereby collective humanities and well‐being can be nurtured. Our inquiry‐by‐method critically explores what compassion is from a disability perspective and how this view of compassion disrupts ableist socio‐cultural, economic, and political bureaucratisation of life. Further, we argue that compassion can provide disabled people and allies with agency to guard against the worst dehumanising impacts of bureaucracy, by caring for themselves and each other. To conclude our article, we share a novel cripped compassion framework for implementing inclusive compassionate futures, which can challenge ableist bureaucratisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Stuart Read & Anne Parfitt, 2026. "Re‐Imagining Inclusive and Compassionate Futures: Challenging the Bureaucracy of Disability Through Compassion," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:11929
    DOI: 10.17645/si.11929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/11929
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.11929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:11929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.