IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v14y2026a11685.html

The Response by Co‐Working Spaces to Digital Transformation in Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Anastasia Sinitsyna

    (Asia Centre, University of Tartu, Estonia)

  • Luca Alfieri

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Studies, Politecnico di Milano, Italy / School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu, Estonia)

Abstract

This article examines how the digitalisation process has reshaped the evolution of co‐working (CW) spaces in Singapore and has contributed to the emergence of hybrid work ecosystems. Drawing on qualitative data from semi‐structured interviews with managers of CW spaces in Singapore, the findings suggest that digitalisation did not create entirely new client segments but instead reinforced the existing ICT‐dominated customer base by stabilising hybrid and remote working practices. At the same time, digitalisation made possible the institutionalisation of virtual CW practices, supported by platforms which serve to integrate video conferencing, collaborative software, and digital community tools. These virtual extensions enhance flexibility, inclusivity, and cross‐border collaboration whilst remaining complementary to physical CW spaces. Within the Singapore context—one which is characterised by strong digital infrastructure and its role as a regional headquarters and innovation hub—CW spaces are evolving towards structurally‐embedded hybrid models. This study contributes to the available literature by conceptualising CW spaces as digitally‐enabled socio‐spatial infrastructures which operate within hybrid work ecosystems rather than as purely physical shared offices.

Suggested Citation

  • Anastasia Sinitsyna & Luca Alfieri, 2026. "The Response by Co‐Working Spaces to Digital Transformation in Singapore," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:11685
    DOI: 10.17645/si.11685
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/11685
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.11685?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hopkins & Anne Bardoel, 2023. "The Future Is Hybrid: How Organisations Are Designing and Supporting Sustainable Hybrid Work Models in Post-Pandemic Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    3. Giuseppina Dell’Aversana & Massimo Miglioretti, 2025. "Coworking spaces for remote workers: an inclusive solution? Advantages and challenges from affiliated workers’ perspectives," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1131-1160, April.
    4. Ignasi Capdevila, 2015. "Co-Working Spaces And The Localised Dynamics Of Innovation In Barcelona," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-28.
    5. Maarten Goos & Alan Manning & Anna Salomons, 2014. "Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(8), pages 2509-2526, August.
    6. Piore, Michael J, 1983. "Labor Market Segmentation: To What Paradigm Does It Belong?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 73(2), pages 249-253, May.
    7. Pavel Bednář & Lukáš Danko & Lenka Smékalová, 2023. "Coworking spaces and creative communities: making resilient coworking spaces through knowledge sharing and collective learning," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 490-507, March.
    8. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2020. "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(6), pages 2188-2244.
    9. Ilaria Mariotti & Mina Akhavan & Federica Rossi, 2023. "The preferred location of coworking spaces in Italy: an empirical investigation in urban and peripheral areas," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 467-489, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Scicchitano, Sergio & Traverso, Silvio & Tundis, Enrico, 2025. "What workers and robots do: An activity-based analysis of the impact of robotization on changes in local employment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    2. Heyman, Fredrik & Olsson, Martin, 2022. "Long-Run Effects of Technological Change: The Impact of Automation and on Intergenerational Mobility," Working Paper Series 1451, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, revised 12 Dec 2025.
    3. Gries, Thomas & Naudé, Wim, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence, Income Distribution and Economic Growth," IZA Discussion Papers 13606, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Martin Lábaj & Tomáš Oleš & Gabriel Procházka, 2025. "Impact of robots and artificial intelligence on labor and skill demand: evidence from the UK," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 953-1001, December.
    5. Jurkat, Anne & Klump, Rainer & Schneider, Florian, 2025. "Robots and wages: A meta-analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 541-567.
    6. Yuefeng Xie & Luman Zhao & Yabin Zhang & Zhenguo Wang, 2025. "How Do Robot Applications Affect Corporate Sustainability?—An Analysis Based on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-29, February.
    7. Belloc, Filippo & Burdin, Gabriel & Cattani, Luca & Ellis, William & Landini, Fabio, 2022. "Coevolution of job automation risk and workplace governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    8. Clément Bosquet & Paul Maarek & Elliot Moiteaux, 2021. "Routine-biased technological change and wages by education level: Occupational downgrading and displacement effects," Working Papers hal-03270715, HAL.
    9. Harry Moroz & Mariana Viollaz, 2024. "The Future of Work in Central America and the Dominican Republic," World Bank Publications - Reports 42043, The World Bank Group.
    10. Krenz, Astrid & Prettner, Klaus & Strulik, Holger, 2021. "Robots, reshoring, and the lot of low-skilled workers," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    11. David Autor & Caroline Chin & Anna Salomons & Bryan Seegmiller, 2024. "New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 139(3), pages 1399-1465.
    12. Henri Haapanala & Ive Marx & Zachary Parolin, 2023. "Robots and unions: The moderating effect of organized labour on technological unemployment," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 44(3), pages 827-852, August.
    13. Ziteng Fan & Jing Ning & Alex Jingwei He, 2026. "Slowing Down or Adapting to Technological Progress? Robot Replacement Risks and Policy Preferences," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 134-148, January.
    14. Nicole Wu, 2023. "“Restrict foreigners, not robots”: Partisan responses to automation threat," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 505-528, July.
    15. Rademakers Emilie & Zierahn-Weilage Ulrich, 2024. "New Technologies: End of Work or Structural Change?," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 21(2), pages 335-344.
    16. Jasmine Mondolo, 2022. "The composite link between technological change and employment: A survey of the literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1027-1068, September.
    17. Deng, Yue & Feng, Aiya & Hu, Dezhuang, 2025. "Gender earnings gap in Chinese firms: Can it be narrowed by industrial robots?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Corrales‑Herrero, Helena & Rodriguez-Prado, Beatriz, 2022. "Mapping the Occupations of Recent Graduates. The Role of Academic Background in the Digital Era," MPRA Paper 123226, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Aug 2024.
    19. repec:ces:ceswps:_10955 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Fierro, Luca Eduardo & Caiani, Alessandro & Russo, Alberto, 2022. "Automation, Job Polarisation, and Structural Change," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 499-535.
    21. Davide Dottori, 2021. "Robots and employment: evidence from Italy," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(2), pages 739-795, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:11685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.