IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v14y2026a10935.html

When Recruiters Talk About Language Skills: Research Challenges of Comparing “Folk” Concepts in Different Languages

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Zehetgruber

    (Department of Business Communication, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria)

Abstract

In job interviews, recruiters, as gatekeepers, make decisions about applicants’ employability, also regarding their language skills. An analysis of recruiters’ beliefs and attitudes towards linguistic and communicative competence, therefore, helps us understand the concepts underlying their decisions. However, the way recruiters discuss these skills and concepts is influenced by the language they use. For this reason, when investigating recruiters’ perceptions, the language of research must be closely aligned with the language of the target group. This article examines the challenges of conducting multilingual research on recruiters’ beliefs and attitudes towards the language skills of job applicants in Austria and France. The study is based on a three‐stage research design, comprising an exploratory analysis of job advertisements, an online survey (? = 277), and focus group interviews (? = 12) conducted in both German and French. This article draws on data and methodological considerations to describe comparability and translatability issues with respect to expressions related to the concept of linguistic competence that recruiters use as linguistic folk. The challenges encountered pertain to the utilization of a multilingual questionnaire and the interpretation and analysis of the resulting data. They also extend to the dissemination of results, which requires translation into English.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Zehetgruber, 2026. "When Recruiters Talk About Language Skills: Research Challenges of Comparing “Folk” Concepts in Different Languages," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:10935
    DOI: 10.17645/si.10935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/10935
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.10935?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v14:y:2026:a:10935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.