IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v13y2025a11540.html

Contemporary Changes in Medically Assisted Reproduction: The Role of Social Inequality and Social Norms

Author

Listed:
  • Anne-Kristin Kuhnt

    (University of Rostock, Germany)

  • Jörg Rössel

    (University of Zurich, Switzerland)

  • Heike Trappe

    (University of Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

This editorial introduces the thematic issue on current developments in medically assisted reproduction (MAR), focusing on how social inequality and social norms influence access, attitudes, and experiences. The contributions in this issue examine the social stratification of reproductive opportunities across different groups and countries, explore the normative and legal frameworks that govern MAR, and consider how evolving family structures challenge existing reproductive policies. The issue also highlights significant data limitations in current research—especially the absence of key variables, such as income or migration status, and internationally comparable data—which hinder efforts to achieve more equitable access to reproductive healthcare. Overall, the contributions advocate for interdisciplinary approaches and better data systems to deepen our understanding of these issues and address reproductive exclusion in modern societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne-Kristin Kuhnt & Jörg Rössel & Heike Trappe, 2025. "Contemporary Changes in Medically Assisted Reproduction: The Role of Social Inequality and Social Norms," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:11540
    DOI: 10.17645/si.11540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/11540
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.11540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicoletta Balbo & Francesco C. Billari & Melinda Mills, 2013. "Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(1), pages 1-38, February.
    2. Maila Mertens & Jörg Rössel & Nadja Colombini, 2025. "Between Ambition and Uncertainty: What Drives Young Women to Consider Social Freezing?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniele Vignoli & Valentina Tocchioni & Ester Lazzari & Marco Cozzani, 2026. "Polarization and Flexibility in Attitudes Toward Assisted Reproduction: A Vignette Study," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2026_02, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Allan Puur & Leen Rahnu & Liili Abuladze & Luule Sakkeus & Sergei Zakharov, 2017. "Childbearing among first- and second-generation Russians in Estonia against the background of the sending and host countries," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(41), pages 1209-1254.
    2. Thaís García-Pereiro & Anna Paterno, 2025. "Nonnationals’ Fertility and the Great Recession in Italy: A Panel Analysis of Quantum and Tempo Responses," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 11(1), pages 175-209, March.
    3. Philipp Dierker & Ariane Ophir & Nicole Hiekel, 2026. "From dating to marriage: changes in short-term fertility intentions across partnership transitions," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2026-010, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    4. Viviana Salinas & Valentina Jorquera-Samter, 2022. "Adolescent fertility and high school completion in Chile: Exploring gender differences," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(31), pages 967-1008.
    5. Radosław Murkowski, 2021. "Selected socioeconomic factors co-occurring with high fertility rate in the OECD countries," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(3), pages 89-108.
    6. Francis Dennig & Bassel Tarbush, 2025. "Economic dynamics with differential fertility," Papers 2503.02074, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    7. José Rafael Caro-Barrera & María de los Baños García-Moreno García & Manuel Pérez-Priego, 2022. "Projecting Spanish fertility at regional level: A hierarchical Bayesian approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-27, October.
    8. Yu Yang & Rongxin He & Ning Zhang & Liming Li, 2023. "Second-Child Fertility Intentions among Urban Women in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:dqrrx_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Jan Van Bavel, 2014. "The mid-twentieth century Baby Boom and the changing educational gradient in Belgian cohort fertility," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(33), pages 925-962.
    11. Ali Ashar Anjum, 2025. "Urbanization as a Driver of Demographic Transition: Insights from Europe and South Asia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(3), pages 5051-5060, March.
    12. Peter McDonald, 2013. "Societal foundations for explaining fertility: Gender equity," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(34), pages 981-994.
    13. Johannes Huinink & Martin Kohli, 2014. "A life-course approach to fertility," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(45), pages 1293-1326.
    14. Maria Tzitiridou-Chatzopoulou & Georgia Zournatzidou & Michael Kourakos, 2024. "Predicting Future Birth Rates with the Use of an Adaptive Machine Learning Algorithm: A Forecasting Experiment for Scotland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-13, June.
    15. Chen-Hao Hsu & Henriette Engelhardt, 2024. "A Precarious Path to Partnership? The Moderating Effects of Labour Market Regulations on the Relationship Between Unstable Employment and Union Formation in Europe," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 40(1), pages 1-28, December.
    16. Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska & Magdalena Grabowska, 2023. "The sex preference for children in Europe: Children’s sex and the probability and timing of births," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 48(8), pages 203-232.
    17. Bastian Mönkediek & Hilde Bras, 2018. "Family Systems and Fertility Intentions: Exploring the Pathways of Influence," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(1), pages 33-57, February.
    18. Sinclair, Sarah & Bubb, Alicia & Boymal, Jonathan & de Silva, Ashton, 2026. "Age- and parity-specific birth trends in Australia: Is low fertility inevitable?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Finlay, Jocelyn E., 2021. "Women’s reproductive health and economic activity: A narrative review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    20. Frank Götmark & Malte Andersson, 2023. "Achieving sustainable population: Fertility decline in many developing countries follows modern contraception, not economic growth," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1606-1617, June.
    21. Mikaela Brough & Paula Sheppard, 2022. "Fertility Decision-Making in the UK: Insights from a Qualitative Study among British Men and Women," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:11540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.