Author
Listed:
- Dominika Gurbisz
(Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Poland / Doctoral School in the Social Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Poland)
- Anna Potoczek
(Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw, Poland)
- Marcin Bukowski
(Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Poland)
- Lucía Estevan-Reina
(Department of Social Psychology, University of Granada, Spain)
- Oliver Christ
(Faculty of Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen)
Abstract
This research investigates the extent of Poles’ tolerance of Jews through the lens of equality‐based respect norms and how these norms translate into general and specific tolerance. Additionally, we reexamine the principle‐implementation gap, specifically highlighting the potential discrepancy between declared tolerance and actual behavioral intentions. Through our analysis, we explore the distinction between measuring tolerance as an abstract principle and its application in concrete, real‐world situations. In three correlational studies ( ? = 818), we examined the relationship between perceived equality‐based respect social norms and the declared endorsement of tolerant principles. Studies 1 and 2 sought to establish initial evidence of this association, hypothesizing that individuals are more likely to express tolerance towards Jewish practices when perceiving stronger societal norms emphasizing respect. Results showed that perceived prescriptive equality‐based respect within both national and acquaintance ingroup norms was positively linked to tolerant attitudes. Additionally, the findings highlight the complexity of measuring tolerance, revealing a possible overestimation of tolerant attitudes when assessed at an abstract level, compared to when measured through concrete examples.
Suggested Citation
Dominika Gurbisz & Anna Potoczek & Marcin Bukowski & Lucía Estevan-Reina & Oliver Christ, 2025.
"Mind the Gap! Linking Equality‐Based Respect Norms with General and Specific Tolerance,"
Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:10143
DOI: 10.17645/si.10143
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:10143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.