Author
Listed:
- Antti Rannisto
(Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Finland)
- Fanny Vainionpää
(Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Finland)
Abstract
Finland is considered a society of high trust. Finnish citizens’ trust in public administration and institutions is clearly above the OECD average, and there is broad consensus on the virtues of maintaining high societal trust. As high‐trust public institutions are now turning to new efficiency‐promising AI technologies, it is important to ask: “How are these [technologies] then capable of upholding that trust?” This question is a direct quote from our fieldwork following Finnish citizens’ everyday trust‐building with new AI‐infused services. Based on a trust‐focused reading of our qualitative data, we propose an approach to trust that affords greater empirical nuance than alternative conceptions, which we see as limited for following the evolving dynamics of citizens’ trust in new technologies. The approach we are developing situates trust within a processual conception of action and highlights the need to also grasp the “quieter”—embodied, habitualized, and intuitive—forms of trust as part of its living dynamic. We then apply this approach to examine the adoption of the Finnish Covid‐19 tracing application and citizens’ perceptions of algorithmically infused services provided by Finland’s social insurance institution. We highlight creative tactics that citizens use to establish trust: the agent heuristic, the case heuristic, the social heuristic, and the interaction heuristic. Our research contributes to a nuanced understanding of trust and its situated dynamics from the citizen perspective, a focus we consider crucial at a time of unprecedented excitement around the transformation of high‐trust institutions through algorithmic technologies.
Suggested Citation
Antti Rannisto & Fanny Vainionpää, 2025.
"Trust‐Affording Action: Citizens’ Everyday Relations With Algorithmized Public Services,"
Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
Handle:
RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:10001
DOI: 10.17645/si.10001
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:10001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.