IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v10y2022i3p184-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How the Everyday Logic of Pragmatic Individualism Undermines Russian State Pronatalism

Author

Listed:
  • Larisa Shpakovskaya

    (Aleksanteri Institute, University of Helsinki, Finland)

  • Zhanna Chernova

    (Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia)

Abstract

The article examines the reproductive decisions of Russian urban middle‐class women. We look at women’s lives in the context of Russian pronatalist family policy and the official conservative gender ideology of 2019–2020. Based on biographical interviews with 35 young women, we focus on working mothers. The sample is composed of middle‐class mothers since their lifestyle serves as a cultural model for the whole Russian society. We reconstruct the everyday rationalities deployed by the mothers to justify their reproductive decisions. The respondents seek “self‐realization,” postponing childbirth or limiting their reproduction. We reconstruct the discourse of “pragmatic individualism” as an everyday logic used by mothers, which helps them cope with the instability of the labor market and marriage and the lack of state social support. Using the logic of “pragmatic individualism,” women present themselves as respectable, socially competent individuals able to build their lives according to middle‐class living standards. The logic of pragmatic individualism contradicts the message of pronatalist state ideology based on “traditional” gender roles and high fertility. It gives women a rational explanation for why, despite socially supported childbearing, they decide to have only one or two children. We argue that while women rationalize childbearing decisions for financial security and social well‐being, their rationale is determined by class standards of respectability. These standards are associated with high standards of care and quality of life for a small number of children.

Suggested Citation

  • Larisa Shpakovskaya & Zhanna Chernova, 2022. "How the Everyday Logic of Pragmatic Individualism Undermines Russian State Pronatalism," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 184-193.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:184-193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5272
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vladimir Gimpelson, 2019. "The labor market in Russia, 2000–2017," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 466-466, September.
    2. Larisa Shpakovskaya, 2015. "How to be a Good Mother: The Case of Middle Class Mothering in Russia," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(10), pages 1571-1586, November.
    3. Tatiana Karabchuk & Tatiana Trach & Varvara Pankratova, 2021. "Motherhood Wage Penalty in Russia: Empirical Study on RLMS-HSE Data," Springer Books, in: Tatiana Karabchuk & Kazuhiro Kumo & Kseniia Gatskova & Ekaterina Skoglund (ed.), Gendering Post-Soviet Space, chapter 0, pages 235-255, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivett Szalma & Hana Hašková & Livia Oláh & Judit Takács, 2022. "Fragile Pronatalism and Reproductive Futures in European Post‐Socialist Contexts," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 82-86.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bargain, Olivier & Etienne, Audrey & Melly, Blaise, 2021. "Informal pay gaps in good and bad times: Evidence from Russia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 693-714.
    2. E. A. Edinak, 2021. "Influence of Key Macroeconomic Factors on the Dynamics of Employment of the Population of the Russian Federation," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 391-398, July.
    3. Demidova, O. & Timofeeva, E., 2021. "Spatial aspects of wage curve estimation in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 51(3), pages 69-101.
    4. Horie, Norio & Iwasaki, Ichiro & 岩﨑, 一郎, 2022. "Returns to Education in European Emerging Markets: A Meta-Analytic Review," RRC Working Paper Series 95, Russian Research Center, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:184-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.