IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v6y2018i4p18-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realising the Benefits of Integrated Data for Local Policymaking: Rhetoric versus Reality

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Durrant

    (Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, UK)

  • Julie Barnett

    (Department of Psychology and Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, UK)

  • Emily Suzanne Rempel

    (Department of Psychology and Institute for Policy Research, University of Bath, UK)

Abstract

This article presents findings from local government projects to realise the benefits of big data for policy. Through participatory action research with two local statutory authorities in the South West of England, we observed the activities of identifying, integrating and analysing multiple and diverse forms of data, including large administrative datasets, to generate insights on live policy priorities and inform decision-making. We reveal the significance of both data production and policymaking contexts in explaining how big data of this kind can be called upon and enacted in policy processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Durrant & Julie Barnett & Emily Suzanne Rempel, 2018. "Realising the Benefits of Integrated Data for Local Policymaking: Rhetoric versus Reality," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 18-28.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:18-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1586
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Giest & Reuben Ng, 2018. "Big Data Applications in Governance and Policy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 1-4.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:18-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.